This weekend was a brutal weekend to be a racing fan in Canada.
By: Mike Sullivan/RaceCanada.ca 
March 25, 2024 

First of all, let's get this out of the way, right off the top. TSN and TSN+ screwed up this weekend, and I mean badly. This is truly unacceptable almost a year in to the TSN+ project.
 
I'm still a subscriber to, and supporter of, TSN+, and ultimately think it will be good for racing fans, but they can't have another weekend like this. TSN is burning up any good will it has with racing fans in an awful hurry. 
 
It started through the week with the TSN+ schedule not showing any of the practice sessions for Indy Car on Friday and Saturday, which was eventually resolved and all the practice sessions were available for TSN+ subscribers. 
 
This was followed by missing the entire TSN+ schedule for Saturday and Sunday, and while it didn't seem to affect any actual programming, it was frustrating having to search elsewhere to see schedules for Indy Car and NASCAR, then hope for the best.
 
If this wasn't bad enough, things were about to get worse, as TSN announced they were moving the Xfinity race to TSN+ and the Cup race to CTV2.
 
Last year, Cup and Xfinity races were shown on TSN linear, so if you were only interested in the races, or couldn't justify another subscription to yet another streaming service, you may not have subscribed to TSN+, and with no US options available to Canadians, you were completely out of luck to see the race if you weren't a subscriber. 
 
The Cup race reschedule might have been even worse. For the Xfinity race, at least you could say, rightly or wrongly, if you subscribed to TSN services, you could see the race, but that's not the case with the Cup race.
 
If you are a cord cutter, and subscribed to TSN.ca directly, which includes a subscription to TSN+, you would think you're good to go for all the major racing series this year, F1, NASCAR Cup, NASCAR Xfinity and Indy Car. This weekend, that was not the case with the Cup race only on CTV 2. So if you had no cable subscription, and like most of us no TV antenna, despite subscribing to "The Home of NASCAR" you were out of luck, you couldn't see the race. That is just not acceptable. 
 
And finally, if all the above wasn't enough, TSN+ completely messed up the start time for the Indy Car race on Sunday. The race started at 12:30 and for some reason TSN+ had it scheduled for 1:00pm and didn't adjust accordingly. And while it was available on NBC over-the-air channels, if you were a cord cutter and dependent on TSN+, then you missed the entire first heat, and the chaos that ensued, maybe the only exciting part of the whole race.
 
The first couple of issues weren't a big problem, they got solved and sorted pretty quickly and nobody missed anything, and can be chalked up to somebody made a mistake, and we got it fixed. The last 3 were a problem that can not happen again.
 
So why does this happen, all too regularly it seems, to motorsport fans?
 
I think there are a couple of main reasons for it. 
 
I think a big part of the problem we have is a complete lack of institutional knowledge about motorsports in sports media, and frankly every other media, industry and institution in Canada. What I mean by this is, outside of Tim Hauraney, I doubt anybody at TSN has been involved, in any meaningful way, with a race weekend. They don't know and understand the sport. Throughout Canada a few thousand people actively take part in motorsports, while hundreds of thousands play traditional stick and ball sports in Ontario alone. 
 
It's why we had Formula 2 logos for Indy Car races on TSN+ last year and why we consistently see posters and graphics with the wrong cars in them (https://twitter.com/marshallpruett/status/1772039184804458845), and arcane references in many articles, not written by actual motorsport media. I'll never forget the early days of the Molson Indy and reading those glossaries in the special sections the Star and the Sun used to publish and seeing the term "Balloon Foot" for a slow driver. I've been involved in racing in one way, shape or form as a driver, mechanic, instructor, car owner and media since 1985 and in those almost 40 years I have neither used, nor heard the term "Balloon Foot". Wanker, yes, Balloon Foot, not so much. 
 
Looking at Friday and Saturday Indy Car practice, I can see somebody seeing "practice" listed on the schedule, and thinking of it in terms of what they know, in their frame of reference of a hockey or soccer practice, and nobody watches those, so it doesn't make it into the TSN+ schedule. 
 
Second, at the end of the day, we also have to accept that motorsports is, for all intents and purposes, a niche sport in Canada. Hockey, football and even curling have much bigger TV audiences than racing does, and when you're in the business of selling advertising, you're always going with the programming that attracts the eyeballs. When things like March Madness come along, we're the bottom rung on the ladder, or near enough to it. 
 
(Just a quick aside, I reached out a couple of years ago to Neilson looking to sign up to get the weekly TV ratings and I was given a price of over $15,000 per year, and there was only one subscription period, from August to August. Unfortunately this was out of my budget...) 
 
So after all this, the question is, why am I still a supporter of TSN+? Also, a couple of reasons. 
 
The main reason I like the idea of TSN+ is unlike the US, we can get all the major North American racing series (F1, NASCAR Cup, Xfinity and Indy Car) in one place, by subscribing to just TSN & TSN+. Compare that to the disaster below just to watch NASCAR Cup & Xfinity in the US. If we add Rev TV and Discover Velocity (they still carry WEC) and combine that with free IMSA.tv and YouTube offerings, the value of getting almost every major racing series in the world for Canadians is pretty reasonable. 
 
24032501c
(This graphic is from Kenny Wallace's Twitter account https://twitter.com/Kenny_Wallace/status/1771972207532790047 I added the CW Xfintiy part)
 
Racing is also a very difficult sport to schedule on traditional, linear TV. 
 
Every single hockey game is 60 minutes, with two 18 minute intermissions and the potential for a 5 minute overtime followed by a possible shootout. 99.9 times out of 100, a hockey game will start and finish in a 3 hour window. 
 
Motorsports is very different. We have rain delays, yellow flags, red flags and different length races. It becomes very difficult to create an exact window that races are going to fit into.
 
What happens when you program a race that goes long, due to rain, or red and yellow flags, and the finish is going to overlap the start of the next scheduled live sporting event, say a hockey game? Do you cut the end of the race off and got to the start of the hockey game and upset the racing fans, or do you stay with the end of the race, and join the hockey game in progress, upsetting the hockey fans? What happens when a race gets into an hours long rain delay? What programming gets bumped hours later? Or do you just not bother? Or do you put it on a tape delay the following morning during the run of SportsDesk shows? 
 
A dedicated, streaming video site solves all of those problems, provided it's set up properly. 
 
 
And to that end, there are a few things I'd like to see added, updated and upgraded on TSN+ to make it a truly winning site for motorsports fans.
 
First, eliminate the self inflicted Cup debacle from this weekend. If I have subscribed to TSN to watch NASCAR, then TSN has ensure that I can see it on a TSN property, either the linear channels, TSN 1 to 5 or TSN+. To that end, I also think TSN has to be upfront with their viewers and say straight up, there may be times when races will be bumped from the linear channels, but anything bumped will always be available on TSN+. 
 
There are also a couple of lessons TSN+ could take from F1 TV. 
 
One of the big issues right now is how long it takes to get the on-demand races posted on the site, last year taking up to 24 hours. (As of writing this at 3:00pm on Monday, the Indy Car race is still not up). F1 TV has the race up immediately after it's conclusion and TSN needs to set that as the bar that needs to be met.
 
Second, you should be able to have an option to start watching the race live, or from the beginning if you get home in the middle of a race, another great feature of F1TV and other streaming services. On Screen controls to rewind and fast forward would be a great upgrade as well. 
 
A big advantage to a streaming site is, or should be, that you no longer need a PVR and there is no danger that you forget to set one. Whenever you come home, you should just be able to watch the race. That shouldn't be up for debate. 24 Hours to post a race on demand is unacceptable. 
 
Another addition I'd love to see in the case of delayed races, especially lengthy rain delays, would be a re-start notification, so the app will notify you on your phone when the race is set to restart. 
 
There are probably a number of other upgrades and features that would likely improve the experience, these are just a few off the top of my head, that should be no-brainers.
 
This weekend was a major failure for TSN and TSN+ and hopefully it's a one off situation, it really should be pretty easy to solve what went on.
 
I know a lot of people already have a ton of streaming services they subscribe to, and nobody is happy to have to pay more, but $80 a year isn't a huge price, and if you are a fan of other sports as well, it's really not a bad deal. 
 
If you don't have a streaming set up already in place, as a racing fan, you're missing out on a ton of racing, and it's no longer difficult or expensive to do. Streaming is the future, don't get left behind for something as cheap as a $40 Chromecast plugged into a a HDMI port. 
 
Add a comment
2023 Indy 500 winner Josef Newgarden. (Photo-Joe Skibinski/IndyCar.com)
By: Anthony Bruno for RaceCanada.ca
February 8, 2024 

History and tradition are two things that are pivotal to the glamour of crown jewel races.
 
But IndyCar’s marquee event may be losing one of its more captivating attractions, as the series looks into a new membership system, one that could see guaranteed Indianapolis 500 entries for full-time teams.
 
The Fastest 33 would be no more in favour of stability and a more attractive bargaining chip for sponsors, recalling memories of the old “25-8” rule from the days of the Indy Racing League, though with it having a different motive.
 
While this isn’t something that I agree with, I understand the business side and this move could be a boon for the sport and keep the lights on, money coming into the teams and people employed, which is important considering the current costs of motorsports operations.
 
A change like this would come with IndyCar’s hands effectively tied and a double-edged sword in its grasp.
 
Consider this from the fan perspective.
 
The Indy 500 and its reputation was partially built on that risk and pressure of no guaranteed entry. With the prestige of the event bringing in multiple single race entries just for the dance, this keeps the big boys on their toes knowing that one bad run, one mistake, could mean you’re at home come race day and not lining up for the green flag and gives those starting from the outside a way in.
 
While it will still carry the mantra of being the greatest spectacle in racing, there is a possible argument to be made of that level of unpredictability that comes with it being diminished.
 
If you were to have this applied to this year, you get a split of 27 and six. With the possibility of only 22 or 23 guaranteed spots, that leaves the remaining 10 to 11 open.
 
While this could provide similar or the same excitement as the Fastest 33, some may not find that as enthralling.
 
The current format gives everyone an even playing field, so to speak. Even though some of the single race entries may not have the facilities of the full-time teams, anything can happen in motorsports, meaning the door is wide open for upsets and crazy stories, like in 2023, where the three full time Rahal Letterman Lanigan cars were amongst the group trying to fight for the final spots.
 
Guaranteed entries all but removes that possibility from ever occurring again and changes how qualifying could go and how it will be approached.
 
Now look from the owner and series point of view.
 
IndyCar isn’t in the greatest of places right now, especially after an offseason that saw talks of Honda’s departure from the sport and the delay of the hybrid power unit that was to arrive at the beginning of the 2024 season.
 
On top of that, when you look at it, how many times would such an instance like the 2023 Bump Day arise, seeing as there are already less entries in this era than in many previous ones, with only 50 percent of the 500s in the last decade having more than 33 entrants.
 
The owners are looking for some stability, something to stand on and provide a consistent banner for sponsors to invest into and this could be it. Having a big team miss the race can be the difference between acquiring or losing the necessary funding.
 
This proposed membership, which draws inspiration from NASCAR, is something that should be beneficial for the sport.
 
Look at the Cup Series as an example. The charter system has provided a great platform and has allowed for new teams to enter like 23XI Racing and Trackhouse Racing and for others, like Spire Motorsports, to increase investment.
 
IndyCar needs to do something and like Pato O’Ward said, there needs to be change.
 
A new membership system may be one of the changes needed for the improvement of the sport, but its deviation from traditions will ruffle the feathers of fans.
 
A move like this is always going to be a damned if you do, damned of you don’t kind of decision.
 
Changing traditions of anything is always going to cause some uproar, even more so when it has the amount of history and prestige that the Indy 500 does.
 
In time, those like myself, that are lovers of tradition and history, will come around to the notion of guaranteed Indy 500 entries. If it is a consequence of creating a way for the series and teams to operate at the maximum potential without fear of layoffs, cost cutting and closure, and allows for the possibility for growth in the sport, it is one that we should embrace, no matter how much we may not like or agree with it.
 

Add a comment
It's entirely possible that we've seen the last-ever race in the W Series.
By: Mike Sullivan/RaceCanada.ca
October 22, 2022
 

We got confirmation last week that the W Series, as had been rumoured, has run out of money and will cancel the final three races of the season, one at COTA this weekend and the season ending double-header in Mexico next weekend, while crowning Jamie Chadwick champion for the third time in as many seasons.

 

And while nothing has been confirmed, and I certainly could be wrong, I think the W Series is dead and buried, and Chadwick will be the series first, last and only champion.

 

From the beginning the W Series was doomed to fail, it was a flawed concept from the start. If the series' raison d'etre was to develop the next female F1 driver, and yet no driver could even move up to F3, including their 2 time champion, then the series was failing almost from the beginning.

 

Young drivers, from sixteen to twenty two or twenty three, need to compete against the best and strongest competition possible and the W Series did not provide that. In fact, by limiting the series to women only, it could never provide that.

 

And while the concept may have been flawed from the outset, the W Series did itself no favours in the way it operated over 4 years, and began burying itself almost from the outset.

 

The first nail in the W Series coffin was the complete cancellation of the 2020 season, to the best of my recollection the only "major" series to do so. Not a good look for sponsors, investors or potential young drivers to see the series not even attempting to run a few races, while virtually all other series managed at least a partial schedule.

 

The second nail also came in 2020, and that was 2019 Series champion Jamie Chadwick getting thrashed in the 2020 Formula Regional European Championship (a regional F3 series with cars almost identical to the W Series), while her 3 Prema team mates dominated the series, finishing first, second and third in the championship while winning 16 of 23 races between them. The best Chadwick could manage was a third place finish in the season opener, while finishing 9th in points, behind 2 drivers that each did less than half the season. Rightly or wrongly, for better or worse, this set the bar for the W Series, and it wasn't very high.

 

The third nail in the W Series coffin was Chadwick winning the series again in 2021. If the 2019 & 2021 series champ can't do better than ninth in a regional F3 series while driving for the championship winning team, F3 team owners have to ask themselves, what does that say about the rest of the W Series field? Again, rightly or wrongly, fair or not, these are the questions FIA F3 teams are going to ask when considering their driver line ups.

 

 

F3 teams are very much a business and they need funded drivers to come to their team. In order to attract funded drivers, their advertising is podiums, race wins and championships. Not many drivers want to sign up for teams that finish 5th and 6th all the time, so signing championship caliber drivers is essential for all teams. They aren’t in existence to charitably hand out seats to mid-pack drivers to make us all feel good.

 

The fourth nail in the W Series coffin was the decision to fly away to several venues as F1 support races this year. Even Formula Two sticks to Europe and the Middle East, never setting foot in North America or the far east. To spend all that money and effort to run single 30 minute races is one of the dumbest things I’ve seen a development series do. Utterly insane. To me, this says, despite claims to the contrary, the W Series really see themselves as an end and not a means to an end. They want to be a WTA or an LPGA, not an FIA Formula 3.

 

As an example, this season's FIA F3 Championship had 9 Rounds compared to the W Series original schedule of 8. The difference, however, is that the FIA F3 series has 18 races in total, compared to the W Series, which would only do a total of only 10, 8 fewer races than F3. The European Formula Regional Series has 10 rounds and 20 races. I’m really not sure how anyone associated with the W Series ever thought that so few races in a development series was going to produce an F1 driver.

 

To my mind, the series administration decided they would rather hang around with the beautiful people in Miami and Singapore, than freeze in a deserted Oulton Park or Thruxton and actually develop race car drivers. There is a reason all developmental series have limited travel and race up to 3 times per weekend. Apparently the lessons of dozens of developmental series all around the world somehow don’t apply to the W Series.

 

I can tell you from experience, there is nothing glamorous about running or participating in development series, but that work has to be put in for young drivers to grow and develop. There is no shortcut.

 

This year’s grid & schedule in particular proved, at least to me, that the W Series was not interested in being a development series, but wanted to be something bigger.

 

While the fly away schedule was bad enough, this year’s grid hardly looked like a training ground for up and coming drivers, and more so an end-of-career path for drivers not going any further.

 

Let's take a look at driver selection. Our own Megan Gilkes, who participated in the first season of the W Series, winning a non-points round, participated in the pre season test in Spain, where she told me she turned top 10 lap times. Megan is 21 years old and should be the kind of driver the W Series is looking for. But Gilkes wasn’t invited to take part in this year's series, and instead competed in the GB4 series, where she scored two wins, with one round still to run at the time of writing. (Personal thought, Megan’s career was much better off running in GB4 than the W Series, so hopefully she can take a positive away from all of this).

 

Of the 19 drivers listed on the W Series website, 8 are 25 years of age or older.

 

So why does a series that claims to be creating the next female Formula One driver have a 30 year old driver who has never finished better than 6th, while turning away a 21 year old with a win in the series?

 

A lot of poor decision making by a group of people who, you would think, should have known better.

 

If there is a W Series in the future, there needs to be great change in the way it operates.

 

First, they need to create a schedule that is at least 10 rounds, plus regular testing, and all of them should all be local in the UK, with maybe two or three on the continent. Each weekend needs to have at least 2 races, and probably should have 3. Young drivers need to race, not lounge around F1 hospitality suites in exotic locales. Again, developing Formula One drivers is not glamorous work.

 

I think they also need to have a couple of “guest” cars to be driven by outsiders, so the top runners in the series have a better benchmark to compare themselves with. They should invite top drivers from FIA F3 and FREC to compete each round to create greater competition at the sharp end of the grid. They may not need to be at every race, but at least 2 or 3 rounds each season. If they insist on keeping it women only, then get Christina Neilson or Sophia Flörsch or Taylor Hagler or Samantha Tan into the guest cars.

 

And for no other reason other than to reiterate just how dumb it was, I’ll say it again, flying off to do a single 30 minute race overseas just so you can say you’re part of the F1 show is probably the dumbest thing I have ever seen a racing series do.

 

The current driver selection process is also flawed, as evidenced by this year’s driver line up. The top 5 or 6 finishing drivers should have the option of returning for a second season (but only 2 seasons, max, the W Series shouldn’t be a career for any driver). I think having a few experienced drivers in the field each season will create greater competition amongst the top drivers, and only allowing a second season, maximum, will not plug up the advancement process for the younger drivers.

 

The rest of the places on the grid should be filled by top finishing drivers from select karting or F1600 championships across Europe, North America and Asia. No favoritism, no feeling sorry for drivers, just the fastest young women that are ready to make the move from karts to cars. 

 

The only other serious option for the W Series is scrapping the current concept altogether and creating an Iron Dames type of team. Regardless, if it is to continue, the W Series needs to make massive changes, what we’ve seen so far has been a sporting and commercial failure.

 

As for the only champion in W Series history, I think Chadwick is a good driver whose career was badly stunted by the W Series. She faced next to no competition and as a result hasn’t progressed to where she should be at this point in her career. 

 

Chadwick has had at least one, and maybe two Indy Lights tests with Andretti (as of writing one test has been completed and a second test is rumoured). I think this is the best route for her to go. It’s incredibly difficult to find the absolute edge of performance again when you’ve gotten used to only needing 8 or 9 tenths to win races. I’d love to see her with Andretti in a 2 season deal for Lights, as season one will be spent learning the cars and the tracks, with season two giving us a much better idea of how competitive she can be. 

 

Only time will tell what the future holds for the W Series. 

 

 

Add a comment
Alex Palou in the 107th Running of the Indianapolis 500 Presented By Gainbridge. (Photo-Joe Skibinski/IndyCar.com)
By: Mike Sullivan/RaceCanada.ca
February 6, 2024 

It seems one of the biggest controversies of the split/post split Indy Car era has returned, with Roger Penske saying guaranteed starting positions for full season teams are back on the table, according to a story in the Indy Star yesterday. (Read the story here -> https://bit.ly/49oHb0m)

 

Let's get a couple of things out of the way right off the top. There is a difference between liking and understanding. For example, I don't like pit lane speed limits, but I understand them. I don't like cost caps in Formula One, but I understand them. I don't like 30 minute breaks for lightning strikes, but I understand them.

 

So, just for the for the record, I don't like this idea, but I understand why they are looking at it, why it will likely come to fruition, probably in the next year or two, and I won't be overly upset about it.

 

In a day and age where the 2nd tier NASCAR series just signed a TV contract worth 5 times the current Indy Car contract, you can't afford the slightest chance of alienating any significant, season long team or sponsor.

 

A lot of people on Twitter are pontificating a definitive answer about sponsor retention after missing the 500, but the fact is, they don't know.

 

They aren't in sponsor meetings and have no idea what sponsors are saying to the teams in those meetings.

 

They have no idea what role missing the Indy 500 plays in a sponsor renewing when their contract it up a year or two later, or if value of the renewal is less because of the 500 miss.

 

They don't know if teams are teams approaching new sponsors in the year(s) after they miss the race and are being turned down because they missed the biggest event on the calendar.

 

Nobody knows except the teams and the sponsors, no matter how much they try to insist otherwise.

 

There was a time when tradition dictated that only Indy Cars raced at the Speedway, and they only raced once a year. Now NASCAR, IMSA and SRO race there, as have F1 and MotoGP in the past. And Indy Car not only races there multiple times a season, they race there twice in the month of May alone. Indy Car is still standing.

 

Tradition dictated that the entire month of May was dedicated to the Indy 500, and now there is only 2 weeks of practice and qualifying. Indy Car is still standing.

 

Tradition dictated that the fastest driver on "Pole Day" was the pole sitter for the race, but that all changed in 2014 with the introduction of a 2 day qualifying shoot-out, with the pole sitter decided on the second day. Indy Car is still standing.

 

Tradition dictated that there were a set of rules drawn up for the race and anyone could build a car and an engine to that set of rules, show up and race it. Now, there is a spec chassis and you have to lease an engine from one of only two approved companies. To me, this is a far greater breach of tradition than guaranteeing 25 or 26 starting spots and having only 7 or 8 spots open to however many cars show up. Indy Car is still standing.

 

A quick count on Wikipedia shows in the last 10 Indy 500's, there have been 5 years, half the races of the last 10 years, where there has only been 33 cars, so no bumping at all. Twice there have only been 34 cars with one bump, twice 35 cars and two bumps and only once with 36 cars, leaving 3 cars to bump.

 

It's a far cry from the record 109 entries we saw in 1982 when bumping really meant something. Spec cars and a limited number of engine leases available are quickly turning bump day into a self ending tradition.

 

To me, these numbers don't justify the slightest possibility of losing a full season entry.

 

It's also worth noting that the two series Indy Car sees itself competing against, NASCAR and F1, both have a type of franchise or charter system in place, both series are much stronger than Indy Car and their teams have risen in value from essentially nothing to tens of millions for a NASCAR charter and approaching a billion dollars for the top F1 teams.

 

Meanwhile, an Indy Car team is basically worth the value of it's equipment at auction.

 

Indy Cars used to be built in small garages all around the country, usually by people that had day jobs. Now, you need a multi million dollar investment in a shop and equipment, and at least a couple of dozen full time specialists to even think of fielding an Indy Car team.

 

The more money you need to spend, the more guarantees you need on that investment. If guaranteeing that your team makes the biggest race of the season means that you guarantee that team also competes in all the races on the calendar, I think that's probably a positive change for the long term interest in the series, whether we like it or not.

 

Bumping isn't being eliminated all together and Indy Car isn't becoming a closed shop like Formula One.

 

Indy Car is not in great shape right now. A case could be made that it has slipped to the fourth most relevant motorsport series in North America. NASCAR has been number one since the split, I think case could be made that international corporations and younger audiences see Formula One as far more relevant and important to them than Indy Car, and riding the success of the new GTP formula I think IMSA is now a serious competitor to Indy Car, having been able to draw a dozen manufacturers to their series, while Indy Car is stuck on two.

 

If teams feel they need this guarantee to justify their continued investment in Indy Car, or to expand it, then I think it only makes sense, love it or hate, to follow through with it and move on to growing the series outside of the 500.

 

Love it or hate, I think it's coming.

Add a comment
It was a weekend of damage control for Devlin Defranceso in Detroit after a qualifying crash put him on the back foot. (Photo-Twitter.com/DevlinDeFran)
By: Mike Sullivan/RaceCanada.ca
June 15 2021
 

 Listen to this article - 8 min, 51 sec 

 

This will be another abbreviated version this week, as we have our first race outing to get ready for with the VARAC race at Canadian Tire Motorsport Park opening the season.

 

World Superbike at Misano

Jonathan Rea has looked pretty dominant in the opening rounds of the 2021 World Superbike Championship, but at Misano he looked beatable, taking a pair of 3rd place finishes, while local hero Michael Ruben Rinaldi on his Ducati took the win in race 1, followed by a 2nd place in race 2. That moved Rinaldi up to 5th in the championship points. Meanwhile, Toprak Razgatlioglu did the opposite of Rinaldi by taking 2nd in race 1 and winning race 2. Those results moved Razgatlioglu up to 2nd in the points, just 20 points behind Rea.

 

NASCAR

All 3 series were in action at Texas for the All-Star race, and I will admit, this is not my favorite event, or my favorite track. I didn't catch much of the Xfinity race, as the red flags caused the Indy Car race to go long, and flipping back and forth wasn't doing much, so I ended up on the Indy Car race, waiting out the red flags. There was another top 20 for Alex Labbe, so another decent finish.

 

Kyle Larson is proving to be the most dominant driver this season, taking the All-Star win, his third in a row, and the fifth in a row for Hendrick.

 

IMSA

It was a great day for Roman DeAngelis and the Heart of Racing Aston Martin team in the GTD class. The team originally finished second, but was moved to first after the winning Audi was penalized for a pit lane violation. IMSA for some reason has yet to update the GTD point standings, but the Heart of Racing Team went into Detroit in second place, trailing the Bill Auberlen/Robby Foley BMW by 7 points, and with the new IMSA scoring system, there is 385 points on offer between the race and qualifying. With the BMW qualifying in fourth, one place behind the Aston Martin, and finishing eighth in the race, if my math is correct then De Angelis and team mate Ross Gunn should leave Detroit with a 115 point lead over the BMW. On a quick glance of the finishing orders, I'm also assuming that the BMW stays in second place, but I'm not doing all the GTD math to figure it out. Hopefully IMSA will update the points at some point in the near future.

 

Mikael Grenier was the only other Canadian running at the finish in the SunEnergy 1 Racing Mercedes coming home in seventh.

 

It was a tough day for the other two Canadians in the race, Jeff Kingsley in the Compass Racing McLaren and Daniel Morad in the Alegra Motorsports Mercedes, were both out early, due to contact, finishing ninth and tenth respectively.

 

The two corvettes showed up for what was really an exhibition run on home soil, since there were no other GTLM cars in the field. The class originally wasn't scheduled to race this weekend, they were supposed to be in France for Le Mans, but with that race put off until later in the summer, IMSA decided to extend the invitation to all GTLM cars, and only Corvette took them up on it. For the record, the #4 Corvette of Tommy Milner and Nick Tandy took the class win over the #3 of Antonia Garcia and Jordan Taylor.

 

Overall, the Ganassi Racing Cadillac DPi took the win, with Kevin Magnussen scoring his first win in almost a decade, along with team mate Renger van der Zande. Felipe Nasr & Pipo Derani took second in another Cadillac, with Ricky Taylor & Filipe Albuquerque rounding out the podium in the #10 Acura.

 

Indy Car Double Header At Detroit

First, we'll start off with the Indy Lights races which, being televised on RevTV we were actually able to see. It was a tough weekend for Devlin DeFrancesco, crashing early in the first qualifying put him on the back foot on a track he's never raced at. The weekend was mostly damage control, managing to make up places early in both races, finishing seventh in the opening race and fifth in the second race on Sunday. Currently DeFrancesco sits in fifth place, with 130 points, 61 behind championship leader Linus Lundqvist. Next up for the Lights is Road America.

 

As always, Indy Lights coverage will be available on REV TV with race one on Saturday at 4:05pm and race two Sunday at 9:50am

 

And now for Indy Car...

 

Race one on Saturday started out very disappointingly, with NBC cutting to the race late because of overtime in the field lacrosse game, meaning we missed the start.

 

The race itself wasn't bad for a street race, with Marcus Ericsson taking his first win, after heart break for Will Power, leading the race, and seemingly in control with 5 laps to go, when the red flag came out. Power's car was unable to restart, after we heard radio from Power begging for cooling fans brought to his car.

 

According to an interview with Power after the race (which we didn't get to see, so thank you Twitter...) Indy Car said they couldn't use any cooling fans until all cars were stopped in pit lane. As it turns out, the cooling fans, or lack there of, weren't the problem. Penske released a statement today saying there was a shut down/start up issue with the car that put the ECU into “boot mode” and needed a Chevy tech to plug into the engine in to reboot the start up process, so in the end, the heat and fans played no part in the failure to re-start. A good article from Racer.com here give an explanation.

As for race 2, I don't know, and I don't care anything about it. First, NBC decided tennis was more important that Indy Car, so the race got shunted from the regular NBC stations to CNBC, which we don't get here in Canada, at least not the version of CNBC that carried the race. I no longer get CNBC, but did check either last year or the year before (I've lost all sense of time since “retirement” and the lockdowns) when the race was moved to CNBC and the version we got was not carrying the race, so if this has changed, someone can let me know.

 

Then of course, Rogers had to outdo themselves by moving the race to Sportsnet World, without any notice. When I put the Tune-In Alerts together on Friday, it was listed as being on Sportsnet 360 at noon, but when I re-checked the guide at noon on Sunday, the programming had been changed. And of course, Sportsnet had a hockey game on all 4 channels from 1987 for the majority of the race, and more wrestling on SN360.

 

Sporstnet is a joke right now, and if Indy Car doesn't sort this situation out with the next contract, then Indy Car may be lost in Canada, and, sadly, the Honda Indy Toronto maybe lost along with it. I'm not going into much more here, I will have a rant about the whole Sportsnet situation later this week.

 

Pirelli Reports On Tire Failures

Pirelli has released the results of their investigation into the tire failures of Red Bull Racing and Aston Martin, and the Twitter army of sim racers won't be happy. In a strangely worded release, Pirelli said, essentially, there was an inner sidewall failure of the tires that was not a result of a manufacturing defect. Red Bull Racing promptly released a statement that said “We did everything Pirelli told us to”

 

The best article I've read on this so far is from RaceFans and you should check it out here. Read between the lines, and you will see exactly what Pirelli thinks Red Bull and Aston Martin were doing with their tires.

I don't claim to be at the level of any of the technical specialists in F1, but I have raced for a few years, and my entire working life has been in the automotive industry, including a lot of years diagnosing tire “failures” for warranty claims, and from the beginning I have thought there was ZERO chance that this was defective tires. I mentioned a couple of weeks ago when first talking about this, that only 2 tires failing, and only during the race, and both being the lesser loaded of the tires to blow just doesn't add up to defective tires to me. And we all know that F1 teams would never try to bend the rules (cough, cough flexible rear wings cough, cough) and figure out how to get around the FIA's inspections to gain an advantage. It's also interesting that the blowouts happened to the 2 teams that, arguably, had the biggest increase in performance from the previous race.

 

The good news for us is we will be at Canadian Tire Motorsport Park this weekend for some in-person racing. We will be creating some content for our Rising Star Jonathan Woolridge for his first Toyo Tires F1600 race, and of course with our luck, Kyle Steckly is also out for his first race at Flamboro this weekend as well. Good luck to both drivers, we'll update you on their race weekends next week.

 

Add a comment